Recently, the New York Times created graphic maps to show the areas of the country where Hillary Clinton was able to win the popular vote in the election of 2016 and areas where President-Elect Donald Trump won.
As it turns out, there’s a vast gulf of difference between the two maps; the map for Hillary Clinton appears to be composed of a sprinkling of scattered islands whereas the map for Donald Trump seems to encompass nearly the entire country.
Of course, it should also be noted that maps of the urbanest areas of the U.S. correlate highly with the Clinton map, but along with that urbanization go high rates of crime and corruption.
In fact, many of these urban centers are beginning to have long-term financial problems that could doom their futures or severely limit them, such as in Dallas, where the city recently suspended withdrawals from its nearly insolvent pension system.
The high-density of these places makes social justice more popular because in many cases, people are literally living on top of one another. All the problems of close coexistence are brought to the fore, and from a political perspective, the Democrats have always catered to these areas with their “machine” organizations.
But in many of these cases, the systems created and supported by the Democrats are thoroughly rotten and collapsing. Watch the explanation for why its legitimate to say that Trump won the popular vote in America.
