Would Hillary Clinton sell her daughter Chelsea in order to become president? Many people-Republican and Democrat-will readily assert that Clinton was one of the most soulless, robotic candidates in political history, who would do almost anything to realize her hubristic ambitions.
A statement made in jest by Fox’s “The Five” substitute host Lisa Boothe suggesting this very idea drew laughs and knowing smiles from viewers, but apparently, Chelsea Clinton herself was so irked by the comment that she felt it was necessary to react to it via Twitter. But unsurprisingly, Chelsea’s response (likely written by one of her staffers or a PR agency) speaks volumes about how on-target the original comment probably is.
For years, it’s been whispered that Chelsea is not the biological daughter of Bill and Hillary Clinton, but rather, the offspring of Hillary and her former Rose Law Firm partner Webster Hubbell (the same Webster Hubbell who as Associate Attorney General under ex-President Bill Clinton was convicted of tax fraud and wire fraud in 1995).
As the story goes, Hillary got intimate with Hubbell in order to become a partner at Rose, and just one look at the face of Chelsea shows that, indeed, she bears no resemblance to the philandering ex-president (and much resemblance to Hubbell). In fact, Infowars’ Alex Jones has produced a hilarious segment on just this subject that’s well worth searching for on the web.
Watch as YouTube channel WJ reveals the trenchant reactions of Twitter users nationwide to Chelsea’s tweet.
