Republican Lawmaker Accuses FBI of Sitting on Evidence ‘Directly’ Contradicting Trump-Russia Narrative

It’s all but impossible to prove a negative. The Democrats count on that fact and squeeze the life out of our culture, and legal and political systems in so doing. You can’t prove Brett Kavanaugh didn’t dry hump Christine Ford 30 years ago. You can’t prove Clarence Thomas didn’t say some rotten things to Anita Hill. And you can’t prove Steve Bannon isn’t wearing five more shirts under his two button-ups.

The law is not set up to deal with questions like that. If it were, we would have a pretty crappy legal system because we would have to go back to superstitious means of settling cases or go back to the judicial duel. (That could be pretty awesome, come to think of it.)

So we’ve been hearing about this Russian collusion bullhonkery for about, what… two years now? Every single day, there’s more talk and no proof. And during this whole time, Trump’s been in the untenable position of trying to prove a negative- which is logically impossible. After all, he may have done it through witchcraft or mind control as Alyssa Milano suggested.

You might have noticed the Democrats are kind of into witchcraft. They might actually buy that story.

Anyway, as it turns out, there actually is some proof that could settle all this Russian meddling bs. Guess what though, sports fans, the proof is in Trump’s favor, and it proves he didn’t do it.

You see, you can prove a positive. It was only a matter of time before the Dems tripped over their hemorrhoids and dropped the ball.

Here’s The Western Journal with the story.


Most Popular

Most Popular