The long-awaited report on the FBI and the Department of Justice’s actions during the Hillary Clinton email treason case has finally been released to the public and Congress. Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report is a whitewashing of the FBI’s crimes while at the same time a great embarrassment.
While Horowitz claims that the FBI did not show bias in its treatment of Hillary Clinton, if you read the report for yourself you may find yourself asking, “What would bias look like, then?” If an FBI agent refers to Hillary Clinton as “the President” immediately after interviewing her for potentially criminal conduct — and it’s still six months before the election — then what is that, if not bias?
An especially embarrassing point, which the largest mainstream media outlets have refused to comment or report on, was the widespread “gifts for leaks” that was happening. Reporters with CNN, MSNBC and some of the nation’s largest newspapers plied FBI agents with sports and concert tickets, booze and other gifts in exchange for leaks into the classified investigation of former Secretary of State Clinton. A more cynical person might consider those to be BRIBES, but hey, bribery is a crime that is only reserved for Republican politicians.
So, what else did the IG report reveal about the criminal Clinton investigation? Check out the Reality Check video below with Ben Swann to learn some of the most significant takeaways from the IG report.
